Talk:Rotumans

Fiji Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

There are many, many issues with this article, as well as a lack of references.

First: The Fijian languages are not “Melanesian languages.” They form one branch of the Polynesian language tree. Western Fijian and Rotuman form one limb of the tree, while the other is formed by the Eastern Fijian-Polynesian languages (I.e. Bauan Fijian, Lauan, Tongan, Sāmoan, etc.). This has been proven by linguists time and time again and it makes sense as Fijians are a mixture of Melanesian and Polynesian peoples. Insinuating that Fijian is a Melanesian language with no relation to Polynesian languages is misleading.

Second: As for the Rotumans— they are a mixture of Fijian, Sāmoan, Tongan, Melanesian, and Micronesian peoples. They did not originate from Tahiti, nor do their languages bear any resemblance to Tahitians in any way. Rotuma was inhabited well before Tahiti was, meaning that it makes no sense to claim that tahitians populated Rotuma.

Third: Rotumans have an appearance typical of Polynesians (from the eastern half of Fiji to Hawaii). They do not look “Tahitian” or “Native American.”

Please stop posting false information about the Rotuman community. It does a disservice to the people and doesn’t bring the proper visibility to their beautiful culture and history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8081:1BA0:398C:BDFE:F853:B32E (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]